Søren Kierkegaard
The most influential philosopher to come out of Copenhagen was Søren
Kierkegaard 1813-1855. For children of the upper-classes in Copenhagen
in the late 1800s, Kierkegaard’s ideas would have been part of the
common cultural inheritance. This would have been especially true for
Niels Bohr, who was from an intellectual home, and one that received
frequent visits from the author of the first (philosophical) book
about Kierkegaard’s philosophy.
- The historian of physics Max Jammer claimed that Kierkegaard’s ideas
influenced Bohr (Jammer 1966).
- Jammer’s claim was vociferously rejected by Leon Rosenfeld
(Rosenfeld 1969).
- Rosenfeld’s stance on Kierkegaard also seems to have rubbed off on
David Favrholdt, who put a lot of effort into explaining why there
couldn’t possibly have been any positive influence of Kierkegaard on
Bohr.
Philosophy of science
(Rosfort 2013) (Halvorson 2023)
One might think that Kierkegaard isn’t interested in metaphysics or
logic – as analytic philosophers understand these terms. But that
would be a mistake. In fact, Kierkegaard believes that bad views about
these subjects lead to confused views about one’s self and one’s task
in life.
- Carlisle, Clare. Kierkegaard’s philosophy of becoming: Movements and
positions. SUNY Press, 2006.
- Come, Arnold B. “Trendelenburg’s Influence on Kierkegaard’s Modal
Categories.” (1991).
- Come, Arnold B. Kierkegaard as Humanist: Discovering my Self. 1995.
- Beiser, Frederick. Late German Idealism: Trendelenburg and Lotze.
- González, Darío. “Trendelenburg: an ally against speculation.” In
Volume 6, Tome I: Kierkegaard and His German
Contemporaries-Philosophy, pp. 309-334. Routledge, 2017.
Against the god’s eye view
“I don’t have a system, but I do have a worldview”
Psychology
Den første betragtingsmåde ser mennesket udefra, som objekt, – den
anden betragtningsmåde ser mennesket indefra, oplever det som
subjekt. Det ‘hele’ menneske kan ikke gøres til genstand for
udvendig betragtning, det kan kun opleves indefra. (Villy Sørensen,
Introduction to The Concept of Anxiety)
Objective inquiry
External references
References
Primary references
We have direct evidence that Bohr read Kierkegaard’s Stages on Life’s
Way – which is not one of Kierkegaard’s more explicitly
epistemological works. It would be much more intriguing if we knew
that Bohr had read Concluding Unscientific Postscript. Nonetheless,
Høffding had read and absorbed all of these works, and had been shaped
by Rasmus Nielsen, whose entire epistemology was Kierkegaard-inspired.
Here are some passages from Kierkegaard’s Postscript
Secondary sources
- Jon Stewart, “Kierkegaard and Hegel on faith and knowledge” in
S. Houlgate and M. Baur, A Companion to Hegel. Wiley-Blackwell
2011, pp 501-518.
Halvorson, Hans. 2023. “The Philosophy of Science in Either/or.” In Kierkegaard’s Either/or: A Critical Guide, 153. Cambridge University Press.
Jammer, Max. 1966. The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics. American Institute of Physics.
Rosenfeld, Leon. 1969. “Review of M. Jammer, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics (New York, 1966).” Nuclear Physics A126:696.
Rosfort, René. 2013. “At Forstaaeliggjøre Og Tyde Naturens Runer.” Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift 76 (2): 133–49.